Regarding Burley’s murky loitering laws

draft 3

http://www.magicvalley.com/articles/2008/10/08/opinion/letters/doc48ebed824c814930609161.txt

With the way Burley’s loitering laws now stand, Henry David Thoreau probably would have been charged with remaining idle in essentially one location, including the concept of spending time idly; being dilatory; lingering, staying; sauntering; delaying; standing around, and hanging around Walden’s Pond (and loving it). Even though Thoreau authored the classic Civil Disobedience, I am not sure that following his own advice would get him very far outside the prison bar, in these, our post Thomas Pained, weary hobo days.

I wonder if it would help the cause of any weary Burley homeless to show that they hold two-pole permits, while fishing beside Walden Pond-like Idaho waters. How can you be guilty of loitering, when it is clear you are a multitasking fisherperson? It’s also interesting to note, how being homeless now is either against the law, or on the cusp of being against the law, in so many communities.

In some areas, we now have more foreclosed homes than we do homeless people. Fortunately, community leaders in a handful of places have seen what a crisis our Nation is in and have gained enough empathy to lighten the laws and / or enforcement of laws regarding squatter’s rights, etc.

Of course, a few bad squatters or actors portraying troublemaking destitute could give these modern dust bowl communities a name as dreadful as Detroit.

In Macomb County, Michigan, the Republican Party chairman intends to use lists of foreclosed homes to block people from voting.

To counterbalance this unfairness, while lessening loitering ratios,

Burley civil justice servers should contemplate improving their cloudy law; by asking peace officers to direct our dispossessed to the nearest voter registration booths, to free themselves, poles apart, from the stagnant waters in which our murky Country has been lingering.