---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: JB
Date: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:22 PM
Subject: Opinion / Letter of Public Interest / Re-submission / Let's make certain we're utilizing the futuristic safety tools we already have
To: <letters@pennlive.com>
From: JB
Date: Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:22 PM
Subject: Opinion / Letter of Public Interest / Re-submission / Let's make certain we're utilizing the futuristic safety tools we already have
To: <letters@pennlive.com>
Hello Editor,
I
received a call from your office this afternoon to confirm this letter
and I believe this new draft will show more strength and understanding.
You have my permission to edit this as you see fit. Thank you for your
consideration of publishing this. I will try to call your office in a
short while to confirm this letter as well.
Best regards,
JB.
Let’s make certain to utilize the futuristic safety tools we
already have
Dear Editor,
I’ve been living in Central PA for
two years now, after relocating here from Idaho. Out West, I worked driving
large trucks for 20 years, and also focused on aircraft safety at Horizon Air
for six. In addition, I’ve been a frequent newspaper opinion contributor,
sometimes writing with a strong emphasis on transportation safety issues.
Now, as a disabled person, I’ve been
working at a Work Skills Program since 2018, and am grateful for this type of
productive work. From my house, I catch the bus to and from work, and though I’ve been
impressed with every parameter of their excellent, efficient and friendly
service for thousands of miles, a handful of times I’ve sensed danger that we
can avoid better.
The majority of my fellow bus
passengers are also disabled and some don’t have much of a voice there, since
their guardians or advocates are seldom aboard. Some may not have enough
experience or the ability to notice every hazard, so I try to speak up for them
and their equal rights for harmless environments.
My top concern for now is
this:
While riding in a
crowded Public bus in spring of 2018, the driver hit a long undivided two lane straightaway and
sped up. Soon she was exceeding 80 mph in a posted 55 zone, and continued this
rate steadily over our next 5 to 6 miles. I wish that my camera then would have
been of enough high quality to zoom in to show this clearly.
A Mobile Logic Unit being assembled
Months later I experienced a
synchronicity when work management trained me for a new task of assembling
“Mobile Logic Units” for bus fleets. When I asked our bus drivers about the
inner workings of these black-box-like devices, they told me that these
recorders transpose and save tremendous amounts of data. For instance, in areas
where commercial motorists exceed speed limits, the variegated maps are
programmed to mark these spots, and indicate them with red flags.
I’m curious though if busy bus managers
make time to address these warnings about bending or breaking speed laws.
Because by many standards operating a commercial vehicle at 25 mph over the
posted limit is consider reckless driving – and with a bus full of nearly
voiceless disabled people to boot!
Coupled with some previous driver-distracting concerns, to which bus management
inadequately responded*, my intuition niggles at me rigorously that
perhaps they do not. And if PennDOT has authority to conduct audits for such
vital bus information, I suggest they investigate bus and other transportation
services to detect if there’s a pattern of missed warning flags, After all, why
would our tremendous public bus services invest in such expensive cutting-edge
safety features if managers might be too busy to notice them, or even worse: willfully
ignoring these?
Indeed, endangering already disabled
passengers like my colleagues should be held as an uppermost consideration to
be avoided at all costs.
Note to Editor: Last week I sent
this suggestion to PennDOT in a similar message.
Thank you,
JB
No comments:
Post a Comment